Bill C-64

Historical
Law (royal assent given)
Law

Pharmacare Act

Bill C-64 has received Royal Assent and is now law. This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session.

Sponsor:Mark Holland
Session: 44-1
Introduced: 2024-02-29

Other Bills Numbered C-64

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. This bill number appeared in 7 sessions:

44-1

Pharmacare Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law
42-1

Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law
41-2

Georges Bank Protection Act

Law (royal assent given)
Law
41-1

Appropriation Act No. 3, 2013-14

Law (royal assent given)
Law
40-2

Appropriation Act No. 4, 2009-2010

Law (royal assent given)
Law
39-1

An Act to amend the Pilotage Act

Second reading (House)
38-1

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (vehicle identification number)

In committee (House)

Division Votes (6)

Division #794
Agreed To
2024-06-03T19:00:00

3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare

165Yea
145Nay
10Paired

Vote by party

Liberal
143Y / 0N
Conservative
0Y / 114N
Bloc Québécois
0Y / 30N
NDP
20Y / 0N
Green Party
2Y / 0N
Independent
0Y / 1N
Division #792
Agreed To
2024-05-30T23:55:45

Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare

169Yea
132Nay
10Paired

Vote by party

Liberal
147Y / 0N
Conservative
0Y / 103N
Bloc Québécois
0Y / 28N
NDP
22Y / 0N
Independent
0Y / 1N
Division #791
Negatived
2024-05-30T23:45:32

Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare (report stage amendment)

130Yea
169Nay
10Paired

Vote by party

Liberal
0Y / 146N
Conservative
102Y / 0N
Bloc Québécois
27Y / 0N
NDP
0Y / 22N
Green Party
0Y / 1N
Independent
1Y / 0N
Division #753
Agreed To
2024-05-07T15:40:00

2nd reading of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare

177Yea
148Nay
2Paired

Vote by party

Liberal
151Y / 0N
Conservative
0Y / 115N
Bloc Québécois
0Y / 31N
NDP
23Y / 0N
Independent
1Y / 2N
Green Party
2Y / 0N
Division #752
Negatived
2024-05-07T15:30:00

2nd reading of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare (reasoned amendment)

151Yea
176Nay
2Paired

Vote by party

Liberal
0Y / 150N
Conservative
118Y / 0N
Bloc Québécois
31Y / 0N
NDP
0Y / 23N
Independent
2Y / 1N
Green Party
0Y / 2N
Division #751
Agreed To
2024-05-06T16:30:17

Time allocation for Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare

180Yea
147Nay

Vote by party

Liberal
153Y / 0N
Conservative
0Y / 116N
Bloc Québécois
0Y / 29N
NDP
24Y / 0N
Independent
1Y / 2N
Green Party
2Y / 0N

Parliamentary Debates (112)

Speeches in the House of Commons that mention Bill C-64.

Mr. Yasir Naqvi2024-05-24
Health
0

Oral Questions

…sary medications available to them. That is why we are actually bringing in pharmacare legislation, Bill C-64. I really hope the member opposite will support that bill because it would allow Canadians to have access to, initially, diabetes medications and contraceptives. In relation to the particular medicat…

Read full speech →
Mr. Tom Kmiec2024-05-22
Government Business No. 39—Proceedings on Bill C-6…
0

Government Orders

…that pearls flow from his mouth because when I compared his speech at second reading on pharmacare, Bill C-64, and his speech on Motion No. 39, they were almost identical. The minister actually used the exact same three anecdotes to make the case for why this plan is necessary. In the summary of the legislat…

Read full speech →
Mr. Tom Kmiec2024-05-10
Government Business No. 39—Proceedings on Bill C-6…
0

Government Orders

…ery single anecdote in this speech that he did in his second reading speech on the bill. This bill, Bill C-64, only got three days of debate in the House, and it was then sent to committee. Now, we have a programming motion, so it is a guillotine or gag order attempting to be imposed on the House of Commons …

Read full speech →
Mr. Tom Kmiec2024-05-10
Government Business No. 39—Proceedings on Bill C-6…
0

Government Orders

… to maybe provide a rebuttal and also to reset the debate, because the debate is not directly about Bill C-64; it is about a programming motion. When I listened to the minister's speech, I also had the time to compare it to his speech that he gave at second reading. The same three anecdotes he raised today w…

Read full speech →
Hon. Mark Holland2024-05-10
Government Business No. 39—Proceedings on Bill C-6…
0

Government Orders

moved: That, notwithstanding any standing order, special order, or usual practice of the House, Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, shall be disposed of as follows: (a) during the consideration of the bill by the Standing Committee on Health, (i) the committee shall have the first priority for the u…

Read full speech →
Hon. Mark Holland2024-05-10
Government Business No. 39—Proceedings on Bill C-6…
0

Government Orders

…obviously at committee, at third reading and at report stage to have a lot more debate on the bill, Bill C-64, and to hear their single position, which is in opposition.

Read full speech →
2024-05-07
Pharmacare Act
Procedural

Government Orders

The House resumed from May 6 consideration of the motion that Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, be read the second time and referred to a committee, and of the amendment.

Read full speech →
Mr. Taylor Bachrach2024-05-06
Pharmacare Act
0

Government Orders

…tion before us. I am so proud to rise on behalf of the people of Skeena—Bulkley Valley and speak to Bill C-64, an act that will lay the groundwork for Canada's first national single-payer universal pharmacare system, a system that is going to help millions of Canadians, including many people in northwest Bri…

Read full speech →
Mr. Taylor Bachrach2024-05-06
Pharmacare Act
0

Government Orders

… shameful and it is something that we in the House can change. We can change it today by voting for Bill C-64. Why would anyone oppose the bill before us? We have heard some of the arguments and, frankly, it is somewhat surprising. I was listening to the member for Red Deer—Lacombe extolling what he sees as …

Read full speech →
Ms. Bonita Zarrillo2024-05-06
Pharmacare Act
0

Government Orders

…, just like what has happened in the United States. I never want to see that happen. Not only would Bill C-64 help women as a framework for historic expansion of health care to single-payer pharmacare, but also the first rollout would give access to life-saving medication and devices for diabetics. Linda, a …

Read full speech →